New legislation, introduced in April 2000, affects anyone who is working via an intermediary, such as a company or partnership. IR35 will only apply if the individual is working for a client under circumstances that if it were not for the imposition of the Limited company or Partnership (known as the "intermediary") would be one of employment. (The Inland Revenue argues that in these cases the individual is "a disguised employee".) Anyone working via an intermediary will be caught by new rules if they fail the "IR35 test". This test determines whether the person would be an employee if they were contracting directly with the "client", rather than using this intermediary. If their terms and conditions or working practices are of employment then they will be caught by IR35 legislation.
The IR35 legislation is designed to increase both the Tax and National Insurance (NIC) to the Inland Revenue from the service industry, which on the whole has found it more tax efficient to distribute income as dividends, usually subject to the payment of a small salary. To this end, it introduces the concept of "deemed salary" which will be taxed and subject to NIC as if it has been paid as a salary.
The Government's concern is that small limited companies are being used to disguise employment, so this is the test which has been applied: -
Where the employee is provided by his/her Company to an ultimate client on terms which would normally constitute an employment with that client, this is called a relevant engagement and the IR35 rules apply.
The test is to determine from the outset whether or not the worker is effectively an employee. The overall picture will be made up by how the contractor operates on a day to day basis - the reality of which must be reflected by the contract. The Revenue will often challenge any contracts and try to discredit them. Some common arguments are:
The Revenue's opinion may be that the contract is not a true reflection of the work carried out. Remaining outside of IR35 is determined by the working practices of the individual. Many people try a "tick" approach. For example if 8 pointers are towards self-employment and only 6 towards employment, then the individual must be self-employed. This is a popular and incorrect basis. In one judgement the judge specifically stated that using a points system would not be acceptable in determining status.
The IR will consider the whole picture but some factors can be:
Each case is individual, so all factors must be considered to arrive at the correct status decision. It is worth noting that the Inland Revenue questionnaire to determine status is over 80 questions in length as they will consider as many factors as possible. Do not leave the decision to the Inland Revenue or it could be a costly exercise once additional Tax, NIC, interest and penalties are added.
The rest of the IR35 section looks at some of the above factors in more detail.
Article kindly supplied by Ray McMahon of www.taxandnic.com