Financial Risk and Payment

Financial risk and payment are one of the main differences between employment and self-employment.

As explained earlier in Hall v. Lorimer, Lorimer had to take work on a first come first served basis. Obviously, there were times he was unable to accept work even though he did occasionally use a substitute. In the period of just over 4 years Lorimer worked for 800 days (out of approximately 1,050 days). In addition, he was also registered for Value Added Tax (VAT) and had some Clients who didn't pay for a few months.

In the case of McMenamin v. Diggles, Diggles agreed to a "Full Clerking Service" at his own expense in return for 8.3% of the barrister's gross earnings. Clearly there is a financial risk as his earnings are based on a percentage of the barristers income.

There could be a risk that the substitute could cost more than the costs the Contractor receives. Conversely, in the Hall v. Lorimer case, when Lorimer used a substitute he made a profit, as his fee from the Client was more than he paid the substitute.

Article kindly supplied by Ray McMahon of

Previous Page

Freelance Alliance
Freelance Alliance
What is Freelance Alliance?
Freelance Alliance